The ABC Homeopathy Forum
Attn : Kadwa
Dear KadwaI saw your reference to Dr. Chandran on facebook. While I too await his response, I had a glimpse on his articles.
He is propounding a new way of interpreting how homeopathic remedies work. He is proposing certain ways of prescribing remedies as per his theory.
With the limited browsing I have gone through his articles, he is in favour of combinining two or three remedies in the same prescription, doesn't frown at alternations, repetitions etc, and tries to fit all these things in his theory.
He also supports Banerji protocols, and tries to explain why they work and feels ithey fit his theory well.
I always say, the proof of the pudding is in eating. Finally the results count.
What I see in general is that, there are cures/relief when the one medicine at a time is followed, with minimal repetitions ,on this forum as well as outside.
This type of practice is in vogue for 200 years, and results are there for all to see. But, the variations proposed in the last fifty years or so, have become too numerous and each school has their own way.
The results are sporadic and the methods are too difficult to follow with confidence. What. I believe is that there must be specific guidelines of what do do when as written very clearly in the Organon.
I am yet to see any of these new alternative proponents, guide the prescribers as clearly as Organon does. They glorify themselves with lot of alternative theories/ Organon biting, but does pretty little in guiding the prescribers, that want to follow their path with specific instructions.
Please pause and look at the cases on the forum itself. How many cases go on and on for years together without resolution, with such a prescribing of alternations, frequent repetitions, multiple remedies? How many are really getting resolved?
I interact with many doctors in the real world too. Here also, the results are same. The one remedy prescribers command such a great following with their results, that they earn Lakhs per month.
The combination prescribers stay where they are..earning just enough to make the ends meet. Had they been successful, people should throng to them, but it is not happening.
The only exception is Benarji protocols. They have formed clear guidelines regarding what to do when. I understand they are successful too. But, they worked at it for more than a century to perfect what they are doing.
They never bother to fit their prescriptions into any theory. Their attitude is either take it or leave it. That is a much better attitude than those of the neo gurus who aspire for fame and name ,by biting at Hanemann, Organon and his methods.
Many times I raised questions to Organon biters. I am yet to get satisfactory answers.
1) What will you do if your one remedy in the morning/ another in the evening prescription or multiple remedy prescription results in favourable response for a few days and relapses?
2) Are there any guidelines what to do next, except deciding on another remedy/ another combination empirically?
3) How do you deal with aggravations in such cases?
Organon has specific, time tested answers to all these and many more questions, where as the other school of thought has very vague answers, if at all.
So, until and unless someone comes out with his own Organon, which clarifies all the prescribers doubts, I will stick to Organon.
The other way is to use Protocols, which are time tested, like Banerji's. There you have no choice. The prescription is pre defined. You simply have to follow it. If it doesn't work, nothing further to do. Refer him to a one remedy at a time prescriber or to a hospital.
The problem is with people who are in between. The basic problem with them is that they don't know what they are doing, fire shots in the dark with the hope that at least one of them will hit the target.
Nothing but wishful thinking.
Enough for now. I invite all those interested to join this debate.
Murthy
[message edited by gavinimurthy on Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:32:41 UTC]
♥ gavinimurthy on 2016-10-28
This is just a forum. Assume posts are not from medical professionals.
This is post I made in 2004. I still subscribe to it.
***********
Homoeopathy is not a belief system. It's principles are contained in a scientific method.
The similar remedy, the single remedy, the minimum dose, the proven remedy - is the accepted scientific paradigm for the application of homoeopathic principles.
Hering's words are as true today as when they were first uttered way back in 1880.
Paradigm shifts consistently ocurr in the world, the birth of homeoapthy for instance, and without these, we would never have climbed out of our caves; there would never have been an agricultural, scientific, industrial or feminist, civil rights or environmental revolution (to name but a few).
A paradigm is something that sets an example, or pattern, for other things. The homoeopathic paradigm has an accepted and coherent tradition of scientific research. Homoeopathic potential is VAST!! If you or anybody else want to shift the safety checks and balances contained in our system off to unknown territory, with unproven dynamized complexes, then please do not call it homoeopathy, 'cause it ain't. The paradigm shift that is really needed to raise collective consciousness may actually lie with the allopathic sector and all their controlling interests.
Finito.
**********
Read the full thread, if you want.
http://abchomeopathy.com/forum2.php/11068/1
Murthy
***********
Homoeopathy is not a belief system. It's principles are contained in a scientific method.
The similar remedy, the single remedy, the minimum dose, the proven remedy - is the accepted scientific paradigm for the application of homoeopathic principles.
Hering's words are as true today as when they were first uttered way back in 1880.
Paradigm shifts consistently ocurr in the world, the birth of homeoapthy for instance, and without these, we would never have climbed out of our caves; there would never have been an agricultural, scientific, industrial or feminist, civil rights or environmental revolution (to name but a few).
A paradigm is something that sets an example, or pattern, for other things. The homoeopathic paradigm has an accepted and coherent tradition of scientific research. Homoeopathic potential is VAST!! If you or anybody else want to shift the safety checks and balances contained in our system off to unknown territory, with unproven dynamized complexes, then please do not call it homoeopathy, 'cause it ain't. The paradigm shift that is really needed to raise collective consciousness may actually lie with the allopathic sector and all their controlling interests.
Finito.
**********
Read the full thread, if you want.
http://abchomeopathy.com/forum2.php/11068/1
Murthy
♡ gavinimurthy 7 years ago
Dear Kadwa
I just saw your remarks about karma etc. Perhaps, the karma of many of the seekers here is making them take polytherapy for years together without any resolution.
It is their karma that they they came here with a hope of cure, which is alluding them, because of the inability of prescribers to stick to the tenants of proper homeopathy.
If they get complex diseases/ disease of the next level, it is also their karma.
Good justification.
Regards
Murthy
I just saw your remarks about karma etc. Perhaps, the karma of many of the seekers here is making them take polytherapy for years together without any resolution.
It is their karma that they they came here with a hope of cure, which is alluding them, because of the inability of prescribers to stick to the tenants of proper homeopathy.
If they get complex diseases/ disease of the next level, it is also their karma.
Good justification.
Regards
Murthy
♡ gavinimurthy 7 years ago
Well, as you said in an earlier thread,
The forum is a train ride. You don't know who is getting on or off or what
They bring to the table.
I had an interesting chat with the forum owner. His aim,in creating this forum Remedy Finder, and material on homeopathy was that people all learn to self prescribe and do not need to hold hands with any prescriber. He is a very unusual person, in that he lets people such as the previous Aussie homeo try to scare anyone from even buying a cell salt.
No one can control this place. Maybe at some point soon, we will just use stem cells from our own bone marrow,
As that is taking off now in USA with
Amazing rejuvenation for $2500.
And in Switzerland they have success with growing and implanting new knees grown from your nose cartilage and they are working on other organs.
The forum is a train ride. You don't know who is getting on or off or what
They bring to the table.
I had an interesting chat with the forum owner. His aim,in creating this forum Remedy Finder, and material on homeopathy was that people all learn to self prescribe and do not need to hold hands with any prescriber. He is a very unusual person, in that he lets people such as the previous Aussie homeo try to scare anyone from even buying a cell salt.
No one can control this place. Maybe at some point soon, we will just use stem cells from our own bone marrow,
As that is taking off now in USA with
Amazing rejuvenation for $2500.
And in Switzerland they have success with growing and implanting new knees grown from your nose cartilage and they are working on other organs.
♡ simone717 7 years ago
To post a reply, you must first LOG ON or Register
Important
Information given in this forum is given by way of exchange of views only, and those views are not necessarily those of ABC Homeopathy. It is not to be treated as a medical diagnosis or prescription, and should not be used as a substitute for a consultation with a qualified homeopath or physician. It is possible that advice given here may be dangerous, and you should make your own checks that it is safe. If symptoms persist, seek professional medical attention. Bear in mind that even minor symptoms can be a sign of a more serious underlying condition, and a timely diagnosis by your doctor could save your life.