The ABC Homeopathy Forum
The Real Danger to Homeopathy: Pseudo-Homeopathy by Dr. Luc De Schepper, MD, PhD, DIHom
This article by Dr. Luc De Schepper, MD, PhD, DIHom would be a great refresher to many on this homeopathy forum.http://drluc.com/pseudo-homeopathy.htm
♥ Homeopathy International 1 on 2011-01-09
This is just a forum. Assume posts are not from medical professionals.
To H I
Please visit the links below which will prove to you and to those who may read this debate on Classical versus Non Classical or the direct 'this for that' therapy that I follow which has been classified as 'Joepathy' by a classical homeopath, is also a very viable protocol to cure patients in comparison to the classical therapy which involves a 2 hour long questionnaire in the hope of identifying that elusive single remedy to 'treat the totality of the symptoms the patient presents', which does not seem to have the same rate of cure that Interhomeopathy seems to have in curing patients.
I am reliably informed that the majority of practicing homeopaths also use my 'this for that' therapy as they cannot possibly spend 2 hours with each patient as they run the risk of losing them otherwise.
PRASANTA BANERJI HOMEOPATHIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION
http://www.pbhrfindia.org/
INTERHOMEOPATHY
http://www.interhomeopathy.org/dogmatism_in_homeopathy
Banerji Protocol of Treatment
The Banerji Protocol is a new method of treatment using homeopathic medicines. Specific medicines are prescribed for specific diseases. Diseases are diagnosed using modern/state of the art methods. This is done because modern diagnostic approaches incorporate and help in the selection of medicines so that specific medicines could be easily prescribed for specific diseases. This is not practiced in classical homeopathy.
The concept of specific homeopathic medicine for a disease based on symptoms was first perceived and practiced by Late Dr. Pareshnath Banerji. With the passage of time and the availability of new diagnostic tools like Ultrasonography, MRIs, cancer markers and other advanced tests, we were able to further streamline the treatment protocols accurately. The efficiency of this streamlining is reflected by the encouraging results of The Banerji Protocol.
In The Banerji Protocol of treatment, mixtures of remedies or frequent repetitions of the remedies are used when required. This is not practiced in classical homeopathy. The combination of two potentized medicines, we use, are made in a meaningful way based on years of clinical experiments and observations by us. They are mixed for special advantages in treatment, so that the aggravation due to drugs can be checked, side effects of the medicines can be abated, quick and uneventful recovery can be ensured in a much shorter time.
Specific homeopathic medicines are also used for supportive care. Homeopathic medicines prescribed on constitutional grounds may play a useful role in supportive and palliative for patients with malignant disease.
The Banerji Protocol is scientific, logical and is based on all modern diagnostic tools and is very realistic.
I have always maintained that it is not the methodology used in the cure of the patient that is paramount.
It is the cure itself that matters especially when it is carried out in accordance with the first 2 Aphorisms of Hahnemann quoted below:
ß 1
The physicianís high and only mission is to restore the sick to health, to cure, as it is termed
ß 2
The highest ideal of cure is rapid, gentle and permanent restoration of the health, or removal and annihilation of the disease in its whole extent, in the shortest, most reliable, and most harmless way, on easily comprehensible principles.
Please visit the links below which will prove to you and to those who may read this debate on Classical versus Non Classical or the direct 'this for that' therapy that I follow which has been classified as 'Joepathy' by a classical homeopath, is also a very viable protocol to cure patients in comparison to the classical therapy which involves a 2 hour long questionnaire in the hope of identifying that elusive single remedy to 'treat the totality of the symptoms the patient presents', which does not seem to have the same rate of cure that Interhomeopathy seems to have in curing patients.
I am reliably informed that the majority of practicing homeopaths also use my 'this for that' therapy as they cannot possibly spend 2 hours with each patient as they run the risk of losing them otherwise.
PRASANTA BANERJI HOMEOPATHIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION
http://www.pbhrfindia.org/
INTERHOMEOPATHY
http://www.interhomeopathy.org/dogmatism_in_homeopathy
Banerji Protocol of Treatment
The Banerji Protocol is a new method of treatment using homeopathic medicines. Specific medicines are prescribed for specific diseases. Diseases are diagnosed using modern/state of the art methods. This is done because modern diagnostic approaches incorporate and help in the selection of medicines so that specific medicines could be easily prescribed for specific diseases. This is not practiced in classical homeopathy.
The concept of specific homeopathic medicine for a disease based on symptoms was first perceived and practiced by Late Dr. Pareshnath Banerji. With the passage of time and the availability of new diagnostic tools like Ultrasonography, MRIs, cancer markers and other advanced tests, we were able to further streamline the treatment protocols accurately. The efficiency of this streamlining is reflected by the encouraging results of The Banerji Protocol.
In The Banerji Protocol of treatment, mixtures of remedies or frequent repetitions of the remedies are used when required. This is not practiced in classical homeopathy. The combination of two potentized medicines, we use, are made in a meaningful way based on years of clinical experiments and observations by us. They are mixed for special advantages in treatment, so that the aggravation due to drugs can be checked, side effects of the medicines can be abated, quick and uneventful recovery can be ensured in a much shorter time.
Specific homeopathic medicines are also used for supportive care. Homeopathic medicines prescribed on constitutional grounds may play a useful role in supportive and palliative for patients with malignant disease.
The Banerji Protocol is scientific, logical and is based on all modern diagnostic tools and is very realistic.
I have always maintained that it is not the methodology used in the cure of the patient that is paramount.
It is the cure itself that matters especially when it is carried out in accordance with the first 2 Aphorisms of Hahnemann quoted below:
ß 1
The physicianís high and only mission is to restore the sick to health, to cure, as it is termed
ß 2
The highest ideal of cure is rapid, gentle and permanent restoration of the health, or removal and annihilation of the disease in its whole extent, in the shortest, most reliable, and most harmless way, on easily comprehensible principles.
♡ Joe De Livera last decade
To post a reply, you must first LOG ON or Register
Important
Information given in this forum is given by way of exchange of views only, and those views are not necessarily those of ABC Homeopathy. It is not to be treated as a medical diagnosis or prescription, and should not be used as a substitute for a consultation with a qualified homeopath or physician. It is possible that advice given here may be dangerous, and you should make your own checks that it is safe. If symptoms persist, seek professional medical attention. Bear in mind that even minor symptoms can be a sign of a more serious underlying condition, and a timely diagnosis by your doctor could save your life.