≡ ▼
ABC Homeopathy Forum



Remedy Finder:




Similar posts:

GERD/Infant Reflux 4Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and feeding problem in Infant. 26 weeks infant with GERD/reflux 8


The ABC Homeopathy Forum

Infant Reflux (GERD)

My 2 1/2 month old son has terrible reflux. He has had it since birth and the doctor prescribed Pepcid, which did not work well, and I would prefer not to use anyway. He chokes, coughs, sputters and spits up with almost every feeding. He also has at least one projectile vomiting episode each day, and occasionally it will come out of his nose as well. He is exclusively breast-fed. I have a friend who had success with Nat Phos 6x for her infant son, and I was wondering if anyone knew how I might be able to use this for my son.

Thank you!
  TLS2014 on 2014-06-26
This is just a forum. Assume posts are not from medical professionals.
Pl give your baby
1. Natrum Phox-6x 2 pallets twice a day
2. Calc Carb-30 4 pills twice a day

Pl keep 30-40 minutes gap between 1 and 2
Pl give this treatment for 10 days and then give feedback

R.P. Tamhankar
shouse_nsk 8 years ago
R.P. Tamhankar

I am glad to note that you are prescribing Nat Phos 6x which as you are probably aware is a remedy that is not normally prescribed by homeopaths as I first pioneered in prescribing it in the early days of this century.

I would like to point out to you that your prescription of Nat Phos 6x may be an overdose at:
'1. Natrum Phox-6x 2 pallets twice a day”

Nat Phos 6x is always marketed in tablets which are about 4mm in thickness and 5mm in Diameter. Don’t you think that prescribing 2 tablets (pallets?) twice daily may be a gross overdose. Nat Phos 6x works by accelerating the passage of milk in the stomach and giving 2 tablets in one dose is in my opinion an overdose and it will not function in the manner that my therapy of giving half tablet before a feed and the balance half after a feed will help the baby who in this case is a 10 week old infant.

For the record I shall copy below my default therapy for Baby GERD which I have prescribed to hundreds of mothers many of whom have confirmed on my website how grateful they are for having given them this prescription and confirmed how quickly it has helped their babies to overcome their reflux.

Joe De Livera

I shall copy my default therapy for Baby GERD which I have prescribed to hundreds of babies which I hope will help your baby too.

The remedy that has proved to be very effective for Baby GERD is:

Nat Phos 6x tablet dissolved in milk given immediately after a feed. Start with half tablet but if the response is not as expected, you may increase to a full tablet but you will not exceed 6 tablets in 24 hours.

You may like to try to reduce the quantity of milk you give for each feed to enable baby’s digestion to stabilize. You will however feed more often. It is essential that you burp baby immediately after each feed.

You will avoid eating all food that can cause any distress to baby.You must know that they are passed on to baby through your breast milk.

It is best not to vaccinate Baby till s/he is over a year old as the after effects in some cases can add to the problems with GERD.
Do not give Baby any solid food till s/he is over 8 months of age.

You (the mother) will take Nat Phos 6x dose 2 tablets after each of 3 meals daily. The idea is that your milk will pass the effect to baby. You may like to know that Nat Phos 6x will help to reduce your weight by 1kg per week very safely.
Report progress in 24 hours and as often as you wish on this thread.

If you discover that baby does not respond to the Nat Phos 6x alone and this has occurred in a few cases, you will contact me again and I shall then prescribe another remedy to reinforce the action of Nat Phos 6x.
Joe De Livera 8 years ago
Nat-phos is a remedy that has long been prescribed by homoeopaths. It was originally introduced to our list of medicines during the 19th century by Dr. E.A. Harrington. It has been used extensively since then by generations of homoeopaths.

There is a record of the proving found in Allen's Handbook and Hering's Guiding symptoms, both books from that same century. Dr. Schussler of course published his experiments in 1873 which lead to his famous Tissue Salt therapy (of which Nat-phos is one).

The indications for Nat-phos, as pioneered by homoeopaths of the 19th century were:

'As a remedy for scrofulosis with similar 'acid' symptoms compare Calc. carb. In gastric catarrhal affections it is to be compared with Calcar., Kali carb., Nux, Coccul., Carbo, Carbol. ac. As a remedial agent for children, for whom Natr. phos. is pre-eminently the remedy, where these acid conditions of stomach and bowels are frequent, compare Rheum, where the whole body, but especially the stool of the little patient, smells sour. It is interesting to note the association of the peculiar Natr. phos. gastric symptoms, so frequently verified clinically, and the symptoms of gout developed in the provings. Remembering the peculiar gouty dyspepsia, we may have in Natr. phos. a most useful remedy.'

'Acidity, sour risings due to excess of lactic acid. Gastric abrasions and ulcerations. Pain after food, in one spot. Vomiting of sour fluids or of a dark substance like coffee-grounds, sour risings, loss of appetite. Dyspepsia with characteristic eructations and tongue, sour taste in the mouth. Pain sometimes comes on two hours after taking food. Nausea and vomiting of acid fluids and curdled masses (not food). Waterbrash with acidity. Flatulence with sour risings. Colic in children with symptoms of acidity, such as green, sour-smelling stools, vomiting of curdled milk, etc. Stomachache from presence of worms. Empty, gone feeling in stomach, with feeling of weight above the ensiform cartilage. Imperfect assimilation of fats from lack of bile.'

Mr De Livra, it is unbelievable to hear a claim that you 'pioneered in prescribing it' when it has already been prescribed for the exact situation you are using before you were even born. I have no idea why you are trying to take the credit for something that is clearly the work of others, credit which is documented in literature published almost 150 years ago.
Evocationer 8 years ago

My apologies for having omitted the 2 words FOR BABIES at the end of the first paragraph in my post which should read as follows:

'I am glad to note that you are prescribing Nat Phos 6x which as you are probably aware is a remedy that is not normally prescribed by homeopaths as I first pioneered in prescribing it in the early days of this century FOR BABIES.'

I was cautioning Tamhankar on his prescribing 2 tablets Nat Phos 6x for a 10 week old infant which I considered was a gross overdose and it was understood that I was referring to the Baby.

I am aware that Nat Phos 6x is prescribed sometimes by classical homeopaths for adults to treat GERD but as far as I am aware, this Biochemic Cell Salt is never prescribed for Babies.

I shall be interested to learn if you have done so yourself.
Joe De Livera 8 years ago
There is no differentiation between adults and children in terms of symptoms, except where there is a physical difference between them (ie. the capacity for growth). This is the same for men and women, or people of different ethnic backgrounds. The symptoms apply to human beings generally. Understanding the philosophy behind our medicines would reveal that quite quickly.

Besides that, there are plenty of cases in the literature of the 19th century of babies and children being given this medicine when it is indicated. Schussler himself mentions it quite often (alongside the other cell salts).

I don't know where you got the idea that homoeopaths were NOT prescribing it for babies.

What homoeopaths haven't done of course is use Nat-phos in a purely Allopathic way as your method does. I suppose you could take credit for using one of our medicines in that fashion and developing an entire therapy around it.
Evocationer 8 years ago

You are not the first ‘classical’ homeopath to challenge the therapy aka “Joepathy” I have prescribed on this ABC and other Homeopathic Forums. Many have done so in the past and the last was a fellow countryman who styled himself as “Brisbane Homeopath” and you may like to read the many debates we have had on the ABC and the Homeopathy and More Forums of which I was a founder member, up to about 2 years ago when he retired after suffering from an accident.

I have studied the same textbooks that you used in College in my free time but did not qualify as to me Homeopathy was only a Hobby to which I was dedicated, and from which I derived a deep satisfaction in helping those who had consulted allopathic doctors and classical homeopaths and discovered that their ailments were not cured after which they consulted me. I treat all patients without charge and in Sri Lanka where I live I give the patient the remedy free of charge.

Sri Lanka today is suffering from an epidemic of Dengue and it is stated that there are over 5000 patients in all the hospitals in this country on a single day on a daily basis. We have had over 40 fatalities to this dread disease during the last 6 months of this year and the figures are mounting.

I have treated over 500 cases with just ONE remedy:
Eupatorium Perfoliatum 200c in the Wet dose made by inserting 3 drops of the remedy into a 500ml bottle of spring water.
I instruct the patient to be given a dose of 5ml every 2 hours and I have not lost a single patient.

It would be of interest to learn if you would dare to follow my example to treat a case of Dengue without following the long rigmarole of the 'case taking' process and treating the 'Symptoms the patient suffers from, with the single remedy'.

I do object to your presumed monopolization of Homeopathy by referring to Homeopathic remedies as being your own private preserve. I note the repeated use of two words 'OUR medicines' in the quotes below:

'Understanding the philosophy behind our medicines would reveal that quite quickly.'
'I suppose you could take credit for using one of our medicines in that fashion and developing an entire therapy around it.”

You are invited to visit my Website:


I established this website to ensure that classical types like you are not permitted to interfere with the therapy I prescribed to the patients who visit it daily. I find that I get over 200 hits daily and you may like to read the responses of the patients themselves who were invariably cured.

I note that you have not confirmed that you have prescribed Nat Phos 6x for babies in response to my inquiry, and you may like to know that I have done so for about 10 years after I discovered that it is by far the most effective and safe remedy to treat reflux in babies.

There is NO record of Nat Phos 6x being prescribed on the ABC and the H&M by you or other prescribers and some observers and advisors have referred to Nat Phos 6x as “Joe’s Protocol”. I have been present on this and other forums since 2002 and have not read of any homeopath who treated Baby GERD with Nat Phos 6x.

I would like to emphasize that it is not the manner that a Homeopathic remedy is used (allopathic or homeopathic) that is relevant in the case of treating a patient. It is the ultimate CURE of the ailment or disease that matters.

You may like to know that I am not alone in using what you term the Allopathic way of treating a patient. You are invited to visit the website of :

I understand that they treat over 1500 patients in their hospital on a daily basis and they use the same Allopathic “This for That” therapy using standard Homeopathic Remedies in the manner that I do, which was labelled many years ago on this ABC forum by some classical members as “Joepathy”

You may also like to visit:

This link refers to a debate I had with a classical protagonist, Gavini Murthy, who was in the habit of criticizing almost every post I made on the ABC and he finally stated:

'You must have observed that I am not the die hard classical homeopath any more.
I now appreciate that homeopathic medicines are capable of curing even when used in the non classical way. '
Joe De Livera 8 years ago
To Evocationer

I see that you have not responded to my post and would appreciate if you will spend a few minutes to read this thread which I have dug up from the archives of the ABC as it will give you an insight into the harsh criticism I underwent a few years ago from a coterie of ‘classical homeopaths’ including your countryman David Kempson aka “Brisbane Homeopath” who would spring into action within a few minutes of my posting my response to a patient I was treating.

This thread pertains to a lady who presented a Breast Lump which I cured in a few days which your countryman David Kempson insisted was not cured in spite of the patient herself confirming that it was.


The reason adduced by David was because I used Joepathy which did not involve the long rigamarole of the Questionnaire without which no patient according to him could be cured. I had proved otherwise and this was confirmed by the patient herself who was very confused by the exchange of posts between me and David.

I shall copy below the relevant posts as I feel that you too should be aware of the form of criticism that I had to undergo from David and a few other ‘classical homeopaths’ who like you criticised almost every prescription that I gave on the ABC simply because I refused to use the standard classical treatment which did not help the patient and preferred to use my Joepathy which worked.

To David Kempson From Joe De Livera on 2011-03-20
To David

I know that you will read this post within the hour. The time in Sydney now is just before 1.00PM and you can time yourself when you read this.

You will note that I was able to help this girl who presented her breast pain on March 8. Today after about 2 weeks on my Joepathy she reports that she is cured up to 98%.

As you are aware, I did not subject her to any long questionnaire as I was certain that Conium 6 and Arnica 30 will cure her.

I have not checked my Radar to verify if the 2 remedies are classically approved or otherwise. This takes too long as I have to start Parallels Desktop to access Radar which as you know is PC software and I use a MacBook Pro. I then have to put the Dongle into the USB socket and it all takes about 5 minutes of my time.

I preferred to use my 'Joepathy' to help this patient.

Any comments ?
This thread continues beneath the following ad.

Re: brest pain From brisbanehomoeopath [Log on to view profile] on 2011-03-20
Cure = removal of all symptoms, not improvement in one. There is no definite cure here.

No idea why you are addressing this to me considering how often we argue. I am sure you don't care at all about my opinion.

Pain is almost 98% gone = promising first step.

Heaviness is not gone = needs to be addressed.

I am really scared = patient's mental state has not improved.

Nobody has checked the Anxiety, the Depression, the Aggravation before menses, the feeling that all sounds and lights are entering her brain. You only state you will have to give more remedies for these - so you have not cured her.

Cure is very clearly defined in homoeopathy - one symptom improving cannot be called Cure. Cure takes place on all levels, mental, emotional, general, local, pathological - usually in that order (although Direction of Cure is not always so clear cut).

Cure must also be measured over time, if a symptom stays away permanently it can be called a cured symptom, assuming that more serious symptoms do not appear (in which case it hase been suppressed). Cure also does not require constant dosing, but remains stable even when the medicine is stopped (depending on the degree of tissue change present).

So please go ahead an cure this patient, for at present you have not done so.

Conium for breast pain and lymph node enlargement (especially hard nodes) is traditional homoeopathy. Stop claiming credit for something that has been ours since long before you were born. I have given Conium for EXACTLY this kind of presentation with good results.

Re: brest pain From Joe De Livera [Log on to view profile] on 2011-03-22
I am copying my post on the link below which is a partial response to David's post above.


'Joeopathy' versus David Kempson aka 'brisbanehomeopath'
From Joe De Liveraon 2011-03-225 replies53 viewsThis post is in response to 2 such posts which David Kempson aka 'brisbanehomeopath' has made on the ABC attacking the therapy I have prescribed to my patients. I presume that he feels the need to criticize me in this manner as he has in the past also attacked me on the basis that it is only he who is the arbiter of what constitutes 'classical homeopathy' which he reckons is the only therapy that can cure the ailment a patient presents for help on this Forum. I have often pointed out to him that some of his attacks have been made on the thread where the patient has confirmed that s/he had already been cured. I have also informed him on many occasions that I am not the only Homeopath who prescribes on the 'This for That' basis where I prescribe the obvious remedy that has cured previous cases of a similar nature to that presented by the patient, and which I am certain is the obvious remedy to cure the present case. According to him the patient must be subjected to about 100 questions many of which are not pertinent to the case as otherwise, according to him, the patient runs the risk of being afflicted by some other more dangerous disease which of course is a figment of his own imagination as this have never occurred in the past 40 years of my involvement in Homeopathy which I practice on a limited non professional basis purely for the satisfaction that it gives me to help suffering humanity.

I shall copy below a few threads where he has attacked me for purposes of record to enable anyone who may have the patience to read this long thread to realize what exactly is the reason for David's belligerent attitude against me.

I have a record of the responses that I have made to David on my computer and feel that they would make a Best Seller if published. The problem however is that his are often so inane that the public who may happen to read them may give up in utter disgust.

It is just that hoity toity attitude that he adopts in dealing with a case that annoys me as he seems to have taken upon himself the ownership of this precious Science of Homeopathy which according to him must only be used within the parameters set by the classical school who prefer to maintain that mystery about this science as it suits their ends financially where the patient is expected to return to the homeopath on a weekly basis at considerable cost.

I must mention here that I am not the only homeopath who prescribed in the 'this for that' manner as in the Indian subcontinent, the majority of homeopath do so as it will take too much of their time otherwise as each case will take over an hour and the average homeopath prescribes to at least 50 patients on a daily basis.

I would also like to record that Dr Prasanta Banerji the founder of the

also uses my therapy which he has clearly specified in his website above.

I shall now copy a post that I made in 2005 on the ABC which refers to the origins of the Wet dose and how this term first saw the light of day. It is now listed on Google with 1600 hits each of which is a case that I have treated.

Dr Luc de Schepper changes my outlook on Homeopathy
From Joe De Liveraon 2005-03-19
26 replies3933 views
Dr Luc de Schepper has completely changed my outlook on Homeopathy especially the method that I have used for the last 30 years to dispense and use remedies to cure ailments. He arrived here in Sri Lanka early this month as a member of Homeopaths Without Borders and I took him to the areas south of Colombo which were affected by the Tsunami that had been under the care of the 2 previous teams of 3 homeopaths in each group who serve for 3 weeks and are replaced by another team. I was unable to observe him treating his patients in the area around the train disaster which is now reckoned to have taken the greatest toll of human lives in the world. On his return to Colombo en route to the US yesterday I had the opportunity of witnessing at first hand the methods he used in consultation with his patients. I was able to invite many of my friends whom I had been treating for their various ailments and was able to observe at first hand his technique which as I said before, has completely changed my outlook on Homeopathy.

He uses the technique of succussing the remedy in water, which was first recorded by Hahnemann in his fourth edition. Dr Luc uses this method exclusively and he assured me that he discovered many years ago that this technique which is hardly used by homeopaths today, is far superior to the technique used by me and almost all other homeopaths of dispensing the remedies which are usually given in small lactose sugar balls activated with the remedy which are usually taken twice or thrice daily. I use neutral No 30 lactose balls which are 3mm ¯ and put in a few drops of the remedy onto these balls in a small glass container with a plastic cap.

Dr Luc's method is to use just 2 granules of No 10 lactose balls which are just 1mm ¯ which he has in a remedy kit of 100 remedies in little glass vials which he informed me is available in India. He uses a 500ml plastic bottle of water of which he decants about 200 ml keeping about 20ml in a paper cup. He then puts just 2 little balls of the remedy into the bottle with 300ml water which he succusses by banging it twice on the palm of his hand. He emphasized that this succussing was the secret of his method whereby the molecules of the 2 balls of the remedy potentizes the water in the bottle which I observed bubbles from the bottom to the top with each bang on the palm. He then took a teaspoonful of the potentized water which he stirred into half a cup of the water which he had decanted previously into it. A teaspoonful of the water from the cup is the remedy which is taken every other day for chronic ailments or daily for acute ailments. He explained in detail that this succussion which must be done daily before this procedure is repeated is the secret of the viability of the cure with the remedy as this tends to lift the potency of the already potentized remedy in the bottle to a slightly degree upwards thereby making it more effective in its effect on the body. This procedure may seem complicated but when it is observed, it is really not difficult.

Dr Luc exclusively uses the 6th potency for chronic cases which are taken every other day and the higher potencies up to 1M for acute cases both of which are succussed twice and taken if necessary every 2-3 hours.

Quite frankly I was very sceptical of the possibility of success in curing any ailment but I had living proof that this method works in the case of my wife and her sister who had been suffering for many years from Osteo Arthritis which is familial. I had been treating them with Bryonia 6c, Kali Phos 6x and Ferr Phos 6x taken 3 times daily for about 6 months after both sisters decided that their use of drugs including the Diclofenac group and other analgesics were only making a bad situation worse by also affecting their digestive systems and perhaps the liver. The discomfort of the arthritis was reduced with the Bry 6 in a few weeks but this was replaced by Sciatica for which I had given Hypericum. This remedy helped the Sciatica but could not eradicate it. On the first day Dr Luc arrived here I took the opportunity of consulting him on behalf of the two sisters who were present for the arthritis and sciatica and he prescribed Mendorrhinum 6c which he successed according to his method. It was the almost initial response of both sisters to this remedy that really converted me to Dr Luc's method as after the second dose which both sisters took about 2 weeks ago, they both felt considerable relief from their sciatica although the arthritic pain continued as he had instructed both to stop my treatment. He prescribed Sepia 6 just yesterday for their arthritis and assured us that this problem would also disappear in time with this remedy. He also confirmed his identification of this remedy by using Radar software which he uses whenever he wants to have double confirmation of his remedy.

I have mentioned Dr Luc's method of prescribing and using Homeopathic remedies in detail as I would like others who are interested and read this short article to also use it and post their comments on this Forum. As I stated in my first paragraph, I have changed my concept of the use of Homeopathic remedies to Dr Luc's method as I am convinced that this is an advance in the use of Homeopathy which Dr Luc and all his thousands of students use and practice in the US today which was first used and recorded by Hahnemann in his Fourth edition which we have all studied but have not used as he originally recommended.

I consider myself very fortunate to have had the opportunity of studying the methods used by Dr Luc yesterday at my residence in the treatment of patients whom I have been treating free of charge as I always have done for the last 25 years.

Joe De Livera

Sri Lanka

I shall copy some posts made in the recent past to which I have responded above.


Re: help me pleaseFrom brisbanehomoeopath on 2011-03-20Homoeopathy does not work according to the accepted principles of chemistry and pharmacology. When we create our medicines through a special process of Succussion and Dilution, the healing potential of a substance is released into the water. The water then carries the signature of this substance, which causes the body to react as if it had come in contact with it, but without any risk of toxic effects.

Wet dose is simply the administration of our medicines using water, rather than taking them straight into the mouth as 'dry' pills. The wet dose or water dose, is more effective for long term management and treatment of disease.

The Wet Dose was invented by Samuel Hahnemann over 150 years ago, the same man who invented Homoeopathy. It is not Joe's wet dose therapy whatever he implies, it is part of our traditional dosage methods.

You can go to this site to learn a bit more about it.



To David KempsonFrom Joe De Livera on 2011-03-20To David

Did you notice that the patient has not responded to your post ?

It is possible that you have frightened her away with your statement:
'Shyveronster it is possible that you are experiencing an aggravation on the homoeopathic remedy. IF it is going to help you, this may be the first sign of that. With any aggravation you MUST stop the homoeopathic medication right away and wait a little while for it to die down. An aggravation is not to your advantage if it goes on too long. If the aggravation is because the remedy is suitable for your condition, once it stops you may see improvement.

An aggravation should not be treated with a second remedy - allow it to stop and then observe if there is any positive change.'

I consider your statement as utter rubbish.

FYI you may like to know that I have never had any reports of any aggravation after using my default remedy Arg Met 6c. I have had patients who have reported a reduction of their chronic arthritic pain after just 2 doses.

Suggest you prescribe Arg Met 6c in the Wet dose to your own patients and report their response.

Re: Suffering from ArthritisFrom brisbanehomoeopath on 2011-03-20Oh please Joe. Frightened her away - really. Stop being so dramatic.

Your delusion that you cannot aggravate your patients using our medicines is dangerous. Your lack of training and education, again, acts to the detriment of the people who come for help here.

Own up to what you do instead of dumping the responsibility. Homoeopathic medicines and their effects are clearly documented over hundreds of years of use.

Not really in the mood for your baiting me into arguments today. The patient can do whatever she feels is right for her - I have given my professional advice which I am sure you will continue to critize and make fun of, as is your usual strategy for dealing with those who know more than you do.

I have often beed advised by many Homeopaths and members of the ABC to leave David well alone and to ignore his inanities but I have always been a person who fights for what I consider is right even at my advanced age of 82 years of age. I believe that I have in doing so, contributed to this precious science of Homeopathy and many of my posts where I have detailed the therapy I have used successfully are recorded in my website.


I believe that I have also debunked the fallacy that David and his classical colleagues have sought to perpetrate that the cure of any ailment can only be achieved by classical homeopathy.

Re: brest pain From sadia72 [Log on to view profile] on 2011-03-26
Dearest joe
Thanks for all your help you did in my case, with massage i feel very good, heaviness is all gone. but wired thing came out i found a dark (pigmented skin patch) on my back shoulder. I run to urgent care, they call it shingles, as Md said a month a half ago after Xray was clear , he suspect i am fighting with shingles but he could not find any patch( remember all muscular pain) but he told me to back if any thing appear, i have no vesicles, no scarey lesion like you can find in web pictures, but i all this pain.....plz help me to get some medicine for it, as its starnge and pain full shingles. my breast is all fine its back of my shoulder, but same one , i was suffering with pain. regards sadia

Re: brest pain From Joe De Livera [Log on to view profile] on 2011-03-26
To Sadia

I am glad that I was able to cure you of the pain that you reported in your Breast on March 8 and this makes it just 18 days to a cure. The massage I recommended also helped in the cure and you are advised to do a gentle massage daily to avoid any future problems. This is to enable your Lymph glands to function without blockage which is the reason for your pain.

Arnica 30c in the Wet dose will also help your problem as it will clear the debris in your body and thereby prevent any blockage in your Lymph glands. Take just one dose for the rest of your life preferably just before bed.

It is unfortunate that my therapy attracted a lot of unnecessary harsh criticism from another member of the ABC and it is my hope that he will desist from criticizing it again as it is obvious today that you have been cured and not palliated as suggested by him.

I note that you now have a case of Shingles or Herpes Zoster which is a viral disease which is reputed to be very difficult to be cured and you can visit the link below for more information:

Shingles (herpes zoster) is a painful, blistering skin rash due to the varicella-zoster virus, the virus that causes chickenpox.

You state that you do not have any lesions and this make it more difficult for me to suggest a remedy for you.

There are a few Homeopathic remedies for Herpes to be used in the Wet dose twice daily that can help you and they are listed below:

Arnica 6c
Antimonium Tartrate 30c
Cantharis 30c
Rhus Tox 30c

I cannot be specific about which of the above remedies can help you and you can use them in the Wet dose taken twice daily in the order given. Please note that you will take each remedy for at least 4 days and if it does not help, you can then take the next on the list.

Report progress weekly.
Joe De Livera 8 years ago
I am not getting involved in some old argument you had with another practitioner. I am not interested in this at all.

I have said my piece. You have wrongly and deceitfully tried to take credit for something that homoeopaths discovered and I have pointed that out. I am certainly not going to be drawn into a ridiculous discussion comparing what we do to what you do. Such a discussion would be pointless as it is clear you have no interest in a genuine discussion.

I am sure, however, that Dr. Du Schepper would be unhappy to see you using his name as some kind of support for what you are doing. I have met him several times and he is a staunch supporter of Hahnemannian homoeopathy. You are working in opposition to homoeopathy.

That is certainly all you will get from me on this matter.
Evocationer 8 years ago
Lets have some honesty here.

Joe you are talking to the ' other practitioner' and http://www.abchomeopathy.com/forum2.php/431531/-the moderator is also aware of the
new name and so are others-

David Sir,

I'm waiting for your help..
Report post to moderator

Re: (Dr. Evocationer only) Chronic Urinary disorder From simone717 on 2014-05-23
Edit Post Report post to moderator

Re: (Dr. Evocationer only) Chronic Urinary disorder From Evocationer on 2014-05-24
I didn't see this post I am sorry. There are a whole lot of separate posts by you here about various things. One single complete case needs to be given. I will post a questionnaire for you to answer
simone717 8 years ago

Post ReplyTo post a reply, you must first LOG ON or Register


Information given in this forum is given by way of exchange of views only, and those views are not necessarily those of ABC Homeopathy. It is not to be treated as a medical diagnosis or prescription, and should not be used as a substitute for a consultation with a qualified homeopath or physician. It is possible that advice given here may be dangerous, and you should make your own checks that it is safe. If symptoms persist, seek professional medical attention. Bear in mind that even minor symptoms can be a sign of a more serious underlying condition, and a timely diagnosis by your doctor could save your life.