Suffering from Carpal tunnel....

Colocynthis 200c in the liquid dose can help you.

This is made by inserting 3 globules of the remedy into a 500ml bottle of spring water which you must shake hard to create bubbles which is called succussion every time, before you sip a teaspoonful 3 times daily for a week reduced to twice weekly when you notice relief.

Hypericum 200c also in the liquid dose made in the same manner will help to reduce your pain. Same dosage as above.

Keep 30 minutes interval between both remedies.

This is just to clarify your post.

I note that you have addressed it to "John" and would like to know if you referrerd to me or to some other. (John Stanton ?)

If you have used the 2 remedies I prescribed, I am glad that that they have worked.

I can also suggest another remedy, Arnica 6c, which will also help you as this will improve the blood supply throughout your body. This will help in the long run and restore the damage that has caused the pain in your elbow for some years.

This is made in the same manner and you can stop both remedies when you feel that they are no longer required and the dosage is twice daily. You should feel the difference in your sleep pattern when you will discover that you sleep very deeply and this will help to rid you of the cause of your Carpel Tunne syndromel.

There is no remedy in homeopathy in disease name of carpal tunnel syndrome,please explain your feelings,your sign and symptoms,though may be local for the proper suggestion of the remedy.What you said previously is insufficient.What type of pain is it?the more you explain the easier will be the selection of the remedy.

sajjad.

To Sajjad

Here is confirmation of another cure which was achieved by my treating the ailment rather than the causative factors.

As I have stated in many posts on this and other forums, I am convinced that this direct method is by far more effective than the rather convoluted method of case taking and prescribing a remedy which comes up in the mind of the prescriber based on the parameters that he has imbibed during his studies.

I do not see any valid reason for not using the direct method that I an

Please ignore the last post which was sent before I had finished with it.


To Sajjad

Here is confirmation of another cure which was achieved by my treating the ailment rather than the causative factors.

As I have stated in many posts on this and other forums, I am convinced that this direct method is by far more effective than the rather convoluted method of case taking and prescribing a remedy which comes up in the mind of the prescriber based on the parameters that he has imbibed during his studies.

I do not see any valid reason for not using the direct method that I and other homeopaths, especially those with a busy practice use of this direct method of treating the disease using remedies that we have used before and are confident that they can help the case that is presented.

If the first remedy prescribed does not help, other remedies can be sought and this is helped with any Homeopathic software like Radar which I use when necessary.

It is just the pretence of aversion to me method and what is worse the constant faulting thereof that I abhor and it is my hope that more homeopaths will leave their prejudices aside and use my direct method of prescribing as the patient is helped in a few weeks like in this case of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome which is, as you know, difficult to help with Homeopathic remedies as analgesics are commonly used to deaden the pain but not to cure it. Surgery is also an option but there is no guarantee that it can help any more than the analgesic drugs.

To Horsetrainer

If you read this post I would like to have an update on your Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Do you suffer from it any more and if so do you still take the Colocynthis / Hypericum that I prescribed with the Arnica ?

I am glad that you responded to my inquiry as this is one way that we homeopaths can verify if the treatment that we give has helped the patients.

I cannot help but mention here that I am not a qualified Homeopath with a diploma and have been marked out to be a maverick in Homeopathy who is fortunately able to help many thousands with my limited knowledge of Homeopathy in my own direct way which is frowned upon by the classical school.
My therapy has been classified as 'Joepathy' but the important fact to be remembered is that many patients who have been suffering for years have discovered that they have been cured very quickly using the therapy that I suggested.

Glad to note that you are using Arnica often. You may like to know that I have used it for 11 years nightly and have no doubt that it has helped me to maintain my state of wellness with BP 120.80 pulse 65 at age 76.

After I read this thread, I gave Colocynthis powder to a frined of mine who was suffering from Carpal Tunnel Symdrom. He is doing fine now.

Good to note that you too recommended it and discovered that it worked.

This is the true spirit of Homeopathy where all of us share our discoveries with each other instead of pretending the it is only the classical method that can heal and that if we use this 'Joepathy' method it can only result in causing other more serious ailments, like when I cure Eczema with Arnica many classical types have warned me that it must result in Asthma.

My point is that if one has confidence in one's ability to heal, I see no reason to go beating about the bush with this classical attitude which frankly I do not believe that even the chief proponents of the classical school fully understand. I cannot imagine how one can plot a constitutional remedy which is supposed to work in a few weeks or months unless one uses Homeopathic software to achieve the prescription. I have observed that even when I use my Radar the possibility of it coming up with the standard remedies that I use for Asthma, Eczema, GERD to name only 3 common ailments, has not occurred so far.

This is the reason why I use remedies that I have discovered will heal for all similar cases and if it does not do so, I then look for the answer with the assistance of Radar.

i must admit joe -some good results appear to be happening---but long view is more complete picture---i know you have not the mind to do other than you do--so all in all--i dont expect you to be otherwise---for true--i have learned from watching cases with arnica and nat-p prescribed by your method...remedy administarton is proper also--wise on your part incorporate that into metod of dosing...this for certain i agree--also potency selection is fine...you do lack case management--but that only comes from knowing disease progression -which your not interested in...i have to say you have been inspiration for me to be more thorough and such--maybe an opposite response --not a follower of your method---jsut very encouraged --not to become as such....this is not insult---this is truth..i use to be upset--and then i reread and found good points---not certain why you always feel need to explain the contrast of your method--and claim as something of your own creation---which you know it isnt--just a way you pick and chose form existing info...all in all joe...thanks

dose method i refer to is --water dose --succussed and adminstered in water --some refer to as split dose---

Patient must be cured ASAP because and (regardless of the technique) other problem is always at the gate (in these days when environment is full of distructive pollutents)

giril--translate that

..i understand ASAP----the'... as possible...' part is dependent on adequacy of prescriber---and cure seems to be a lossely used word these days--allopaths use the same word 'cure'--..this is the long view importance...not every case is a dire emergency--then in those acute sittuations anything goes as long as survival is obtained...chronic ills--another story.one that needs more tan quick thinking or quick prescribing---common mistake to mix the 2 in methology..

Dear John,

It makes me glad to read your post which if I interpret it correctly, you accept that I have in my own way which is now termed 'Joepathy', been able to help many hundreds, of patients who would otherwise have been blundering along seeking assistance from the classical homeopaths who in the usual way would have in most cases, have lead them up the garden path.

I believe that it is just the lack of an education in a homeopathic college that I have worked out the modus operandi in treating cases that I handle both on the ABC and in the case of those who seek my assistance here in Sri Lanka. I seem to sense an undertone of doubt in your post when you stated:
' i have to say you have been inspiration for me to be more thorough and such--maybe an opposite response --not a follower of your method---jsut very encouraged --not to become as such....this is not insult---this is truth..i use to be upset--and then i reread and found good points---not certain why you always feel need to explain the contrast of your method--and claim as something of your own creation---which you know it isnt--just a way you pick and chose form existing info...all in all joe...thanks '


The point that I would like to emphasize is that my Joepathy method only involves the treatment of the ailment and not the symptoms to find the proverbial 'constitutional remedy' which I feel is just a big bluff on the part of those who feel that they must use the classical method of treatment by looking at the entire ' picture '. My point is that by fooling themselves that they must spend the time of over a hour in case taking when the most inane questions are asked from the suffering patient who has perhaps consulted the homeopath for say Asthma, he, the homeopath, spends a lot of time in seeking the constitutional remedy instead of following my lead and prescribing Nat Sulph 6c in the wet dose which you have noticed has helped many patients who posted on this forum a few weeks ago who can be considered well on the road to a cure. It is not every homeopath who will have the courage to take the bull by the horns as I do. I make bold to do so as I am quite confident that my therapy has worked and as you have rightly stated in your post, it is very unlikely that I will change my method of diagnosis and treatment as I have achieved many successful hits where the patient is at least well on the road to a cure. I will not state that he is cured as this will usually take some time but the fact is that I have achieved what other homeopaths have not been successful in doing which is to help the patient, like Shiny's boy and a few others whose cases you may have read about, which is to help them to lay aside their Ventolin inhalers and to use a remedy which is guaranteed not to do them any harm.

I am very glad indeed that I have served as a catalyst to you and hopefully other homeopaths to adopt a more positive attitude towards a homeopathic cure as it is all in the mind of the homeopath that if he does not abide by the rules that he has been brainwashed into believing when he was granted his diploma, that this was the only method that could possibly cure the patient. The great anomaly in the classical method is that the poor patient leaves the homeopath with the remedy which he uses as soon as he gets home and discovers the following day that it has not helped him in the slightest. He then phones the homeopath or visits him again in a couple of days and is curtly informed that this is the usual way of a homeopathic cure which will take a few more weeks. This scenario as you know is repeated in almost every case till the patient a few months later when he is on both homeopathy and his inhaler for his asthma discovers the ABC and if I see the post and feel that I can help which I do in the case of a select number of ailments, I give my usual default remedy and like in the case of Shiny's boy he was for the first time in his life able to sleep without the inhaler or the other remedies that were prescribed by the classical homeopaths which had not done any good to him for about 6 weeks.

Please note that I am not telling you this story out of any bravado but it is a sincere statement of fact which I believe you have now seen the efficacy of my 'joepathy' in helping a few select ailments which as you know, I specialize in.

As I mentioned to Girilal, it is my hope that other homeopaths will also help each other by sharing their success stories and even their unsuccessful stories in the use of remedies for various ailments as I believe that it is through this method of sharing that Homeopathy can progress into the future. There is so much jealousy and even hate that I encountered on other forums that I now do not bother to even visit them as they all live in a world of their own with one homeopath scratching the other's back as they have discovered that this is survival for them.

I do derive some vicarious satisfaction that at least some of them do visit the ABC to check up on what I am up to next and this has been relayed to me by my homeopathic friends both in the US and the UK where I am informed that they all wait for my next 'release'.

Joe De Livera

I used the word ASAP for As soon as possible. Of-course pain must be resolved ASAP. Certain Medical characters of certain materials can't be ignored but used for the betterment.

i like hours spent in case study--but thats me--doesnt make me better--just a preference....as for joe -opathy---well may well get your name in some book..who knows...i hope for myself not to get that recognition...being frowned upon keeps me honest..otherwise i might get ideas...

giril--ok i get it..pain resolution is correct as in immediacy..here is where i mix the 2 (acute stage/chronic stage)...i usually go too deep for acute state---and miss the boat...but things are a changing....

First Aid is a must.

true--first aid is to be first study...then chronic .....

What I resent is that 'holier than thou' attitude of the classical school who invariably criticize any remedies that I make as according to them my choice must be followed by dangerous side effects. It is interesting that even if I identify a remedy with Radar, the mere fact that it was me that gave the remedy is sufficient reason for them to question my choice on other forums (not ABC).

The irony is that in many cases they have living evidence that my therapy has helped the patient, like in Asthma, but that is not sufficient for the classical types who insist that any remedy that I suggest cannot be accepted on their forum merely because I have always been outspoken in my choice which I delight in insisting is based on the allopathic 'this for that' formula.